Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0921420120170010130
Korean Journal of Communication Disorders
2012 Volume.17 No. 1 p.130 ~ p.142
Analysis of Articulation Error Patterns Depending on the Level of Speech Intelligibility in Adults with Dysarthria
Lee Young-Mee

Sung Jee-Eun
Sim Hyun-Sub
Han Ji-Hoo
Song Han-Nae
Abstract
Background & Objectives : The purpose of the current study was to investigate the articulation error patterns according to the level of speech intelligibility and to examine which articulation error patterns significantly predicted speech intelligibility in adults with dysarthria.

Methods: One hundred speakers with dysarthria and 25 native listeners participated in the present study. Based on the levels of speech intelligibility, speakers were classified into three groups: highintelligibility speakers (n=44), mid-intelligibility speakers (n=33), and low-intelligibility speakers (n=23). APAC words were used as stimuli for obtaining dysarthric speech. Articulation error patterns were classified into eight categories as follows: omission, substitution, distortion, addition of consonants, prolongation, repetition of the phonemes and syllables, intra-word pause, and non-speech sounds. Frequencies of articulation error patterns were examined by speech-language pathologists. Speech intelligibility was judged by 25 native listeners using a word transcription task.

Results: Results of the two-way ANOVA (groups x articulation error patterns) revealed that the two main effects were statistically significant, indicating that high-intelligibility speakers showed fewer errors than the rest of the groups, and that substitution had a significantly higher frequency for error than the rest of the patterns. A two-way interaction was statistically significant due to the fact that the group differences emerged only in three articulation error patterns (substitution, omission, and intra-word pause). A stepwise multiple regressions analysis showed that omission, substitution, and nonspeech sounds were significant predictors of speech intelligibility in dysarthria.

Discussion & Conclusion: The current study suggested that the articulation error pattern varied depending on the level of speech intelligibility and may differentially contribute to speech intelligibility in persons with dysarthria. The clinical implications of the results are discussed in terms of evaluating dysarthric speech and developing a speech recognition device for dysarthric speakers.
KEYWORD
speech intelligibility, dysarthria, articulatory errors
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)